F.A.Q.

Answer:  Simmons' lackluster performance has prompted the Falcons to reassess their secondary strategy and consider more reliable alternatives like Fuller. This shift indicates a need for a more dynamic safety duo that can better support the defense, which may influence their draft strategy and potential free-agent signings moving forward.

Answer:  Simmons struggled to replicate the elite form he displayed with the Denver Broncos, leading to a disappointing season for the Falcons. His inability to make impactful plays or contribute consistently to the defense raised concerns about his effectiveness in the new scheme. This underperformance has prompted the Falcons to seek new options for strengthening their secondary.

Answer:  Simmons' departure opens the door for younger players like Hellams to step in and potentially bring a fresh perspective to the defense. This could invigorate the secondary and allow for a more adaptable scheme that can better respond to opposing offenses. Retooling the safety position can lead to improved playmaking and support for the cornerbacks.

Answer:  Simmons' struggles can be attributed to various factors, including scheme fit and perhaps a lack of motivation given the team's overall performance. His regression in tackling efficiency and coverage suggests that he wasn't able to adapt to the team's evolving strategies, which might have hindered the defense's success.